• S&T Moderators: VerbalTruist | Skorpio | alasdairm

Science 2022 Ig Nobel Prize winners

This is delightful:

That's awesome. My favorite is the Literature prize: analyzing what makes legal documents unnecessarily difficult to understand.

I hate when I go to vote and they have some statute on the ballot written in legal-speak that you have no fucking clue whether to vote yes or no. I think they do this on purpose to confuse voters.
 
The 2022 Ig Nobel Prizes will be awarded at the 32nd First Annual Ig Nobel Prize ceremony, on Thursday, September 15, 2022. The ceremony was webcast.
APPLIED CARDIOLOGY PRIZE [CZECH REPUBLIC, THE NETHERLANDS, UK, SWEDEN, ARUBA]
Eliska Prochazkova, Elio Sjak-Shie, Friederike Behrens, Daniel Lindh, and Mariska Kret, for seeking and finding evidence that when new romantic partners meet for the first time, and feel attracted to each other, their heart rates synchronize.
REFERENCE: “Physiological Synchrony is Associated with Attraction in a Blind Date Setting,” Eliska Prochazkova, Elio Sjak-Shie, Friederike Behrens, Daniel Lindh, and Mariska E. Kret, Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 6, no. 2, 2022, pp. 269-278.
<https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01197-3>
WHO TOOK PART IN THE CEREMONY: Eliska Prochazkova, Mariska Kret

LITERATURE PRIZE [CANADA, USA, UK, AUSTRALIA]
Eric Martínez, Francis Mollica, and Edward Gibson, for analyzing what makes legal documents unnecessarily difficult to understand.
REFERENCE: “Poor Writing, Not Specialized Concepts, Drives Processing Difficulty in Legal Language,” Eric Martínez, Francis Mollica, and Edward Gibson, Cognition, vol. 224, July 2022, 105070.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105070>
WHO TOOK PART IN THE CEREMONY: Eric Martínez, Francis Mollica, Edward Gibson

BIOLOGY PRIZE [BRAZIL, COLOMBIA]
Solimary García-Hernández and Glauco Machado, for studying whether and how constipation affects the mating prospects of scorpions.
REFERENCE: “Short- and Long-Term Effects of an Extreme Case of Autotomy: Does ‘Tail’ Loss and Subsequent Constipation Decrease the Locomotor Performance of Male and Female Scorpions?” Solimary García-Hernández and Glauco Machado, Integrative Zoology, epub 2021.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12604>
REFERENCE: “Fitness Implications of Nonlethal Injuries in Scorpions: Females, but Not Males, Pay Reproductive Costs,” Solimary García-Hernández and Glauco Machado, American Naturalist, vol. 197, no. 3, March 2021, pp. 379-389.
<https://doi.org/10.1086/712759>
REFERENCE: ” ‘Tail’ Autotomy and Consequent Stinger Loss Decrease Predation Success in Scorpions,” Solimary García-Hernández and Glauco Machado, Animal Behaviour, vol. 169, 2020, pp. 157-167.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.08.019>
WHO TOOK PART IN THE CEREMONY: Solimary García-Hernández, Glauco Machado

MEDICINE PRIZE [POLAND]
Marcin Jasiński, Martyna Maciejewska, Anna Brodziak, Michał Górka, Kamila Skwierawska, Wiesław Jędrzejczak, Agnieszka Tomaszewska, Grzegorz Basak, and Emilian Snarski, for showing that when patients undergo some forms of toxic chemotherapy, they suffer fewer harmful side effects when ice cream replaces one traditional component of the procedure.
REFERENCE: “Ice-Cream Used as Cryotherapy During High-Dose Melphalan Conditioning Reduces Oral Mucositis After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation,” Marcin Jasiński, Martyna Maciejewska, Anna Brodziak, Michał Górka, Kamila Skwierawska, Wiesław W. Jędrzejczak, Agnieszka Tomaszewska, Grzegorz W. Basak, and Emilian Snarski, Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 22507, 2021.
<https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02002-x>
WHO TOOK PART IN THE CEREMONY: Marcin Jasiński, Anna Brodziak, Kamila Skwierawska, Wiesław Jędrzejczak, Emilian Snarski

ENGINEERING PRIZE [JAPAN]
Gen Matsuzaki, Kazuo Ohuchi, Masaru Uehara, Yoshiyuki Ueno, and Goro Imura, for trying to discover the most efficient way for people to use their fingers when turning a knob.
REFERENCE: “How to Use Fingers during Rotary Control of Columnar Knobs,” Gen Matsuzaki, Kazuo Ohuchi, Masaru Uehara, Yoshiyuki Ueno, and Goro Imura, Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, vol. 45, no. 5, 1999, pp. 69-76.
<https://doi.org/10.11247/jssdj.45.69>
REFERENCE: “Experimental Studies on the Rotary Control of Columnar Knobs — The Number of Fingers used at the Time of starting Rotary Control,” Gen Matsuzaki, Goro Imura, and Maseru Uehara, Proceedings of the Third Asia Design Conference, 1998, pp. 37-40.
WHO TOOK PART IN THE CEREMONY: Gen Matsuzaki

ART HISTORY PRIZE [THE NETHERLANDS, GUATAMALA, USA, AUSTRIA]
Peter de Smet and Nicholas Hellmuth, for their study “A Multidisciplinary Approach to Ritual Enema Scenes on Ancient Maya Pottery.”
REFERENCE: “A Multidisciplinary Approach to Ritual Enema Scenes on Ancient Maya Pottery,” Peter A.G.M. de Smet and Nicholas M. Hellmuth, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 16, no. 2-3, 1986, pp. 213-262.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(86)90091-7>
WHO TOOK PART IN THE CEREMONY: Peter de Smet, Nicholas Hellmuth

PHYSICS PRIZE [CHINA, UK, TURKEY, USA] [AWARDED JOINTLY TO TWO GROUPS]
Frank Fish, Zhi-Ming Yuan, Minglu Chen, Laibing Jia, Chunyan Ji, and Atilla Incecik, for trying to understand how ducklings manage to swim in formation.
REFERENCE: “Energy Conservation by Formation Swimming: Metabolic Evidence from Ducklings,” Frank E. Fish, in the book Mechanics and Physiology of Animal Swimming, 1994, pp. 193-204.
<https://www.google.com/books/editio...e+from+Ducklings&pg=PA193&printsec=frontcover>
REFERENCE: “Wave-Riding and Wave-Passing by Ducklings in Formation Swimming,” Zhi-Ming Yuan, Minglu Chen, Laibing Jia, Chunyan Ji, and Atilla Incecik, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 928, no. R2, 2021.
<https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021.820>
WHO TOOK PART IN THE CEREMONY: Frank Fish, Zhi-Ming Yuan, Laibing Jia, Chunyan Ji, Atilla Incecik

PEACE PRIZE [CHINA, HUNGARY, CANADA, THE NETHERLANDS, UK, ITALY, AUSTRALIA, SWITZERLAND, USA]
Junhui Wu, Szabolcs Számadó, Pat Barclay, Bianca Beersma, Terence Dores Cruz, Sergio Lo Iacono, Annika Nieper, Kim Peters, Wojtek Przepiorka, Leo Tiokhin and Paul Van Lange, for developing an algorithm to help gossipers decide when to tell the truth and when to lie.
REFERENCE: “Honesty and Dishonesty in Gossip Strategies: A Fitness Interdependence Analysis,” Junhui Wu, Szabolcs Számadó, Pat Barclay, Bianca Beersma, Terence D. Dores Cruz, Sergio Lo Iacono, Annika S. Nieper, Kim Peters, Wojtek Przepiorka, Leo Tiokhin and Paul A.M. Van Lange, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 376, no. 1838, 2021, 20200300.
<https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0300>
WHO TOOK PART IN THE CEREMONY: Junhui Wu, Pat Barclay, Bianca Beersma, Terence Dores Cruz, Sergio Lo Iacono, Annika Nieper, Kim Peters, Wojtek Przepiorka, Leo Tiokhin, Paul Van Lange

ECONOMICS PRIZE [ITALY]
Alessandro Pluchino, Alessio Emanuele Biondo, and Andrea Rapisarda, for explaining, mathematically, why success most often goes not to the most talented people, but instead to the luckiest.
REFERENCE: “Talent vs. Luck: The Role of Randomness in Success and Failure,” Alessandro Pluchino, Alessio Emanuele Biondo, and Andrea Rapisarda, Advances in Complex Systems, vol. 21, nos. 3 and 4, 2018.
<https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525918500145>
WHO TOOK PART IN THE CEREMONY: Alessandro Pluchino, Alessio Biondo, Andrea Rapisarda
[NOTE: This is the second Ig Nobel Prize awarded to Alessandro Pluchino and Andrea Rapisarda. The 2010 Ig Nobel Prize for Management was awarded to Alessandro Pluchino, Andrea Rapisarda, and Cesare Garofalo, for demonstrating mathematically that organizations would become more efficient if they promoted people at random.]

SAFETY ENGINEERING PRIZE [SWEDEN]
Magnus Gens, for developing a moose crash-test dummy.
REFERENCE: “Moose Crash Test Dummy,” Magnus Gens, Master’s thesis at KTH Royal Institute of Technology, published by the Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, 2001.
<https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:673368&dswid=-2909>
WHO TOOK PART IN THE CEREMONY: Magnus Gens
 
  • Like
Reactions: CFC
ECONOMICS PRIZE [ITALY]
Alessandro Pluchino, Alessio Emanuele Biondo, and Andrea Rapisarda, for explaining, mathematically, why success most often goes not to the most talented people, but instead to the luckiest.
REFERENCE: “Talent vs. Luck: The Role of Randomness in Success and Failure,” Alessandro Pluchino, Alessio Emanuele Biondo, and Andrea Rapisarda, Advances in Complex Systems, vol. 21, nos. 3 and 4, 2018.
<https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525918500145>
WHO TOOK PART IN THE CEREMONY: Alessandro Pluchino, Alessio Biondo, Andrea Rapisarda
[NOTE: This is the second Ig Nobel Prize awarded to Alessandro Pluchino and Andrea Rapisarda. The 2010 Ig Nobel Prize for Management was awarded to Alessandro Pluchino, Andrea Rapisarda, and Cesare Garofalo, for demonstrating mathematically that organizations would become more efficient if they promoted people at random.]

Double Ig Nobel laureates. Both for comparing things in larger world to randomness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CFC
I hate when I go to vote and they have some statute on the ballot written in legal-speak that you have no fucking clue whether to vote yes or no. I think they do slthis on purpose to confuse voters.
Yeah.
It happened to me while voting in the midterms. Five states, including Tennessee, had measures on the ballots to amend their constitutions such that slavery (yes, slavery!) would be declared illegal. Louisianna's initiatve did NOT PASS.

But it might not be their fault. I'm a fairly literate college graduate who had to read the question three times to be sure whether or not I was voting FOR or AGAINST slavery.
(for the record, I'm agin it)

For all I know, Tennessee tried to vote to preserve the "peculiar institution." Most folks might have been just confused.

Anyway, I can't wait till the next yungun asks me how old I am. I can honestly state:
"Well, I voted to repeal slavery."
 
  • Like
Reactions: CFC
The Literature Prize was surely a mistake. That paper is fyre and most definitely a useful addition to the literature.
 
Yeah.
It happened to me while voting in the midterms. Five states, including Tennessee, had measures on the ballots to amend their constitutions such that slavery (yes, slavery!) would be declared illegal. Louisianna's initiatve did NOT PASS.

But it might not be their fault. I'm a fairly literate college graduate who had to read the question three times to be sure whether or not I was voting FOR or AGAINST slavery.
(for the record, I'm agin it)

For all I know, Tennessee tried to vote to preserve the "peculiar institution." Most folks might have been just confused.

Anyway, I can't wait till the next yungun asks me how old I am. I can honestly state:
"Well, I voted to repeal slavery."
Agreed, I'm against slavery of any form. I think the "slavery" they speak of in modern terms is about the Prison Industrial Complex forcing inmates into hard labor and if they pay at all, it's for pennies per hour.
 
The Literature Prize was surely a mistake. That paper is fyre and most definitely a useful addition to the literature.
There are some honestly solid papers that won Ig-Nobels. Maybe those best capture their goal of making you first laugh, then think.
 
Top