• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

DEA Uses RAVE Act Threats to Block Montana NORML/SSDP Benefit

NightShade

Bluelighter
Joined
Jun 17, 2002
Messages
102
DEA Uses RAVE Act Threats to Block Montana NORML/SSDP Benefit

http://www.drcnet.org/wol/290.shtml#dearave

An agent of the federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) used threats of RAVE Act prosecutions to intimidate the owners of a Billings, Montana, venue into a canceling a combined benefit for the Montana chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (http://www.norml.org) and Students for Sensible Drug Policy (http://www.ssdp.org) last week.

The RAVE Act, now known officially as the Illicit Drug Anti-Proliferation Act, championed by Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE), was ostensibly aimed at so-called raves, the large electronic music concerts often associated with open drug use, but was so broadly written that opponents argued it could be applied against any event or venue where owners or organizers did not take sufficiently repressive steps to prevent drug use. Opposition to the bill stalled it in the Senate last year, but this year Biden stealthily inserted it into the enormously popular Amber Alert Bill, which passed last month and was signed into law by President Bush.

While the Billings event was advertised as a benefit concert for two local groups interested in drug law reform -- not as a drug-taking orgy -- it still attracted the attention of the DEA. On May 30, the day the event was set to take place, a Billings-based DEA agent showed up at the Eagle Lodge, which had booked the concert. Waving a copy of the RAVE Act in one hand, the agent warned that the lodge could face a fine of $250,000 if someone smoked a joint during the benefit, according to Eagle Lodge manager Kelly, who asked that her last name not be used.

"He freaked me out," Kelly told DRCNet. "He didn't tell us we couldn't have the event, but he showed me the law and told us what could happen if we did. I talked to our trustees, they talked to our lawyers, and our lawyers said not to risk it, so we canceled," she said. "I felt bad. I knew the guys in the bands."

Primary event organizer Adam Jones was unavailable for comment, having been arrested and jailed by his probation officer for switching work-study jobs at Montana State University-Billings without first informing him. He is on probation for possession of psychedelic mushrooms. It has been speculated, but not yet confirmed, that the probation officer, described in unprintable terms by several local sources, was responsible for siccing the DEA on the benefit.

"The DEA guy kept talking about Adam Jones," Kelly said. Jones apparently got the hint. In a message relayed from jail, Jones announced that we was resigning from SSDP and NORML and foregoing further drug reform efforts until he is free from the clutches of the state. That probably spells the temporary demise of Teachers Against Prohibition (http://www.teachersagainstprohibition.org), a group that education major Jones founded after having run smack up against drug war reality with his arrest (http://www.drcnet.org/wol/278.html#teachersagainstprohibition).

DEA Denver regional office spokesman Bill Wyman confirmed to DRCNet that an agent had visited the Eagle Lodge to warn of possible RAVE Act violations and their consequences, but deferred a more detailed response to Special Agent in Charge Jeff Sweet, whom Wyman promised would call back shortly. We're stilling waiting for that call.

"This confirms all our fears about the RAVE Act," said Bill Piper of the Drug Policy Alliance (http://www.drugpolicy.org), which spearheaded opposition to the bill, succeeding in blocking it last year. "This isn't about drug parties or raves, it's about having a club to hold over people's heads, whether its hemp festivals, circuit parties, dances, whatever. The RAVE Act is being used to suppress political speech. This is exactly what Sen. Biden said would not happen, and now it's happening," he told DRCNet.

Biden's office did not respond to repeated DRCNet inquiries about whether the Montana intimidation effort was what he intended the act to accomplish. But Biden wasn't alone in his silence. None of the three members of the Montana congressional delegation, Sens. Max Baucus (D) and Conrad Burns (R), and Rep. Dennis Rehberg (R), responded to DRCNet inquiries either.

Other national drug reform organizations also expressed shock and outrage. "This looks like the first application of the RAVE Act, and this is a very scary precedent, said NORML Foundation head Allen St. Pierre. "Preemptively shutting down a First Amendment-protected event is something that just doesn't happen in America," he told DRCNet. "This is absolutely what we feared and predicted would happen if the RAVE Act passed. Isn't Montana known for being resistant to federal encroachment? This should make them mighty uneasy."

"This is just more evidence that the current administration is engaged in a culture war targeting medical marijuana patients, glass blowers, festival goers and young people," said SSDP national director Shawn Heller.

"Wow," said Marijuana Policy Project communications director Bruce Mirken. "This appears to be a clear violation of the purpose and intent of the law. The RAVE Act's sponsors said repeatedly it was to crack down on people knowingly allowing open drug use," he told DRCNet. "To use it to crack down on reform organizations is an outrageous First Amendment violation. If laws, no matter how wrongheaded, aimed at drug use and distribution are used to intimidate efforts to discuss reform or raise money for reform, we are getting really Orwellian. I really hope the folks up there sue and sue hard."

Montana activists are also worried but undaunted. Missoula Hempfest organizer and Montana NORML spokesman John Masterson told DRCNet the threat of RAVE Act prosecutions was being carefully considered. "The Hempfest committee just spent most of our last meeting talking about this," he said. "We have more than 5,000 people each year in a Missoula city park. Is the DEA going to come after the city? We are meeting with local attorneys to discuss this, but we're not talking about canceling Hempfest. Screw that."

And the drug reformers are mobilizing. A conference call among NORML, SSDP, MPP, Montana NORML and the Montana ACLU was set for Thursday night or this morning. "We may have a coalition up to fight this by the end of the day," St. Pierre said Thursday. "The Drug Policy Alliance warned us the RAVE Act would be used to suppress free speech, and they haven't been proven wrong. Looks like we have our first case."
 
Wow," said Marijuana Policy Project communications director Bruce Mirken. "This appears to be a clear violation of the purpose and intent of the law. The RAVE Act's sponsors said repeatedly it was to crack down on people knowingly allowing open drug use," he told DRCNet. "To use it to crack down on reform organizations is an outrageous First Amendment violation. If laws, no matter how wrongheaded, aimed at drug use and distribution are used to intimidate efforts to discuss reform or raise money for reform, we are getting really Orwellian. I really hope the folks up there sue and sue hard

my sediments exactly.

this is a sad time to be alive in the USA.
 
THE WOOD said:
this is a sad time to be alive in the USA.

My thoughts exactly.

Now this need to be brought to the attetion of news-reporting agencys across the USA. This law was hidden from the public, and now the public is feeling the effects of it. If everbody in the nation knew 100% how much this law could be, & is being abused, I would bet the people would be outraged.
 
Absurd.....

What words can I not find to express my mind right now..........

This is already bullshit. So what can we do? Send this article to the papers!? Send it to every local news station in the general area? CNN, Fox News? What? .........WHAT!?

:|
 
Send this article to the papers!? Send it to every local news station in the general area? CNN, Fox News? What?

What good will that do? We get lots of American media up here in Canada, and it's pretty clear that they aren't interested in following up on anything that might appear in the least bit pro-drug. And exposing the possible flaws in regulations intended to stem the use of drugs in society falls under that umbrella.

The American government does not need to muzzle the media. Why? American media organizations are self-muzzling.
 
......yeah.......

Takes hit......."Mmm, yes........yes I suppose your right." "All this shit gives me a headache."

I wann..a licence plate sticker that say's: "Weed.....it's what's for dinner." <--For some reason I was typing this shit for too long. And realized that I was mumbling on a keyboard, and decided to delete it. But said screw it. I'll just type all of this shit instead to save time........(?!?!)...... all the while including an explanation to why it is I have lost my mind. :D

"I thought."

:|
 
Petersko said:
What good will that do? We get lots of American media up here in Canada, and it's pretty clear that they aren't interested in following up on anything that might appear in the least bit pro-drug.


right, because the american media is owned by the DEA. money buys power.
 
this is a sad time to be alive in the USA.

It's only sad if we don't do anything about it. The current administration is lighting civil liberty sparks all over the place, if we actually light the fire and revolt we could lead a revolution in this country. The question is, do we want to sit around and wait until we are living in 1984 or do we want to do something drastic about it and be remembered as a generation that turned this country around? They pretty much ended segregation in the 60's because people decided to do something about it, now it is our turn to do something about the injustices of our time.
 
Get involved - visit www.dcnc.org

*this was taken from another board i am on...people are sending this to him..he isn't a big help for our case...try it! least youll know you did something!!!*


Below is a letter your can cut and paste and send to Biden

Biden, Joseph - (D - DE)
201 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Phone: 202-224-5042
Fax is the best: 202-224-0139
TDD: 202-224-5652
E-mail: [email protected]

Dear Senator Biden,

On May 30th, 2003, a DEA agent walked into the Eagles Lodge in Billings, Montana and threatened the managers of the lodge with a $250,000 fine if the event scheduled for the next day were to take place. The event was a fundraiser to support reforming Montana’s current medicinal marijuana laws. The DEA agent told the managers that if even one event attendee was caught using drugs that the managers could be prosecuted. The authority for this threat came from your amendment to the PROTECT Act which was signed into law exactly one month earlier. Under pressure from this threat, the managers cancelled the event.

No evidence, nor even an allegation, exists that the managers were “knowingly and intentionally” making their venue available for the distribution or use of controlled substances. In fact, the Eagles Lodge is well known charitable organization that supports police, firefighters, and research in areas such as Heart Disease, Kidney Disease, Diabetes and Cancer. Yet, because they were allowing their venue to be used for a political rally for the reformation of marijuana laws, which is constitutionally protected speech of the most fundamental kind, they were threatened with prosecution under your amendment.

On January 28, 2003, you testified in Congress:
“We know that there will always be certain people who will bring drugs into musical or other events and use them without the knowledge or permission of the promoter or club owner. This is not the type of activity that my bill would address. The purpose of my legislation is not to prosecute legitimate law-abiding managers of stadiums, arenas, performing arts centers, licensed beverage facilities and other venues because of incidental drug use at their events. In fact, when crafting this legislation, I took steps to ensure that it did not capture such cases.”

Your law has now captured such a case.

On May 30th, the very first known application of the Illicit Drug and Anti-Proliferation Act has threatened to “prosecute legitimate law-abiding managers…[for] incidental drug use”. This is an obvious violation of its intended use, which you, the law’s author, have clearly stated. We ask that you take action to immediately remedy this abuse by taking a public stand against these threats and amend the legislation to ensure incidents, such as in Billings, Montana, never again occur.

Sincerely,

*your name here*

Get involved - visit www.dcnc.org
 
Last edited by a moderator:
^^ that is supposed to say isnt a big help for our case lol...but bluelight wont let me edit my posts at all today OR delete them...weird.

[comment: I went ahead and fixed it for ya :) -BA ]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top