Nightraver
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2016
- Messages
- 870
Hmm hypocrisyInstead of finding a way to discredit those you disagree with try to find common ground
Hmm hypocrisyInstead of finding a way to discredit those you disagree with try to find common ground
I approve this message fwiwInstead of finding a way to discredit those you disagree with try to find common ground
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18985458/Impact of auditory stimulation at a frequency of 5 Hz in verbal memory.
Introduction: The objective of this study was to establish whether stimulation at 5 Hz enables immediate words recall.
Method: A total of 20 participants received auditory stimulation at 5 Hz-theta, beta-13 Hz frequencies, white noise (WN) and words.
Results: The results indicate significant differences in the number of recalled words per day depending on the stimulation frequencies. From the third to the fifth day a significant association was shown between increasing numbers of recalled words at 5 Hz compared with the rest of the frequencies. If we take the number of words recorded during the recording of the magnetoencephalography into account, significant differences with greater numbers of words between 5 Hz and between 13 Hz and 5 Hz and WN were found in the second measure. The median frequency only showed significant differences in stimulation at a frequency of 5 Hz.
Conclusion: Auditory stimulation over a long time at a frequency of 5 Hz generates a coupling of brain activity that increases the capacity of immediate verbal memory.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5389622/Altered cortical and subcortical connectivity due to infrasound administered near the hearing threshold – Evidence from fMRI
In the present study, the brain’s response towards near- and supra-threshold infrasound (IS) stimulation (sound frequency < 20 Hz) was investigated under resting-state fMRI conditions. The study involved two consecutive sessions. In the first session, 14 healthy participants underwent a hearing threshold—as well as a categorical loudness scaling measurement in which the individual loudness perception for IS was assessed across different sound pressure levels (SPL). In the second session, these participants underwent three resting-state acquisitions, one without auditory stimulation (no-tone), one with a monaurally presented 12-Hz IS tone (near-threshold) and one with a similar tone above the individual hearing threshold corresponding to a ‘medium loud’ hearing sensation (supra-threshold).
The ability to create an invisible beam to place sound only where you want it
• Elimination of the need for a speaker enclosure
• Reduction of the effect of room acoustics on sound quality
• Ability to manipulate or selectively position or diffuse the source of sound
• Ability to deliver a beam of sound over longer distances than conventional speakers
• Ability to penetrate other competing sounds The ability to focus sound like a light beam offers a number of new sound applications. Examples of some of the directed sound applications being developed by us and prospective OEMs include:
• Elimination of feedback from live microphones
• Plasma screens for focused in-store advertising or promotion
• Home theater to beam selected channels of audio to desired points within the listening environment
• Laser megaphone to “beam” a sound to a single point hundreds of feet away
• Drive-thru ordering communication to limit “noise pollution” to the surrounding environment
• Tradeshow exhibits to directly communicate to customers at a kiosk or display
• Individual audio stories in front of exhibits or points of interest
• Focused paging systems
• Pin-point audio conferencing
• Focused noise cancellation
US Navy scientists have developed a powerful non-lethal weapon designed to "annoy" people into not speaking.
The unusual sonic weapon is designed to disrupt speech by forcing people to listen to the sound of their own voice.
Similar to hearing an echo on a Zoom call, it effectively records someone's speech at long range and echoes it back to them with a slight delay.
Navy boffs call this weapon an acoustic hailing and disruption (AHAD) system.
While it is unclear how the technology will be used in action, it could be used for crowd control in riots or to target public speakers.
Engineers at the Naval Surface Warfare Center explain that in "normal speech, a speaker hears their own words with a slight delay, and the body is accustomed to this feedback.
"By introducing another audio feedback source with a sufficiently long delay, the speaker's concentration is disrupted and it becomes difficult to continue speaking."
Crucially, only the speaker will hear the feedback thanks to a highly targeted audio system, so people around them will have no idea why speech has become so difficult for them.
Similar tools - such as the Japanese SpeechJammer - target an individual's speech at close range, so it is unclear how the Navy's kit will function at long distances.
The US Navy already uses many sonic weapons, such as playing extremely loud noises to disperse crowds.
However, other more secretive sound weapons have been used by different militaries in devastating ways."
Is it George Santos?US Navy develops top secret sonic weapon so annoying
Is there any specific reason you think someone, anyone is targeting you?
The CIA hasn’t gone after people randomly for quite some time.
If the CIA is truly after you, you would be exhibiting behaviors very similar to psychosis, but you would also be coherent and sound-minded at the same time. To be honest you fit both of those descriptions rather well.
I would suggest you stop researching the CIA/Government, forget about everything, and see if the problems go away.
As someone who professionally works with RF technology and electromagnetic fields, I don't see this as possible. There are certain frequencies that are known to cause discomfort in humans such as infrasounds which are very low frequencies below the human hearing range that begins at 20Hz (these sounds are 19Hz and under). They may be unnerving because we can feel them but can't hear them. As far as electromagnetic fields there are some studies that show that our brains' electromagnetic fields can pick up and interact with the earth's EMF but there's never been anything to indicate that it affects behavior on anything other than a rudimentary level. For example, animals may use EMF fields to guide navigation such as migratory animals and I read somewhere that dogs will orient themselves along the earth's north-south magnetic axis when they poop (idk how true that last one is but I read it somewhere).I'm somewhat of a skeptic on this conspiracy theory, but I have often wondered if it would be possible. There are people who call themselves "targeted individuals" and claim that the government is using HAARP and/or other high tech installations to beam mind control signals into their brain. In other words to change their emotional state using electromagnetic frequencies. I find their claims rather chilling and sometimes wonder if they are on to something, as some of them honestly don't strike me as crazy but merely experiencing something that most don't. However, do their claims violate the laws of plausibility and physics? In other words, could governmental organizations beam signals into someone's brain from afar like that? Or is that impossible? Thoughts? How much energy would it take to do that? And if it wasn't directed at one individual but merely these people are more astute to it than others....... perhaps a diffuse signal of some kind is being beamed from such installations to the populace at large. That would make somewhat more sense to me given the way that I understand these things, though admittedly I still don't buy it. Perhaps, that actually is a scientifically valid hypothesis though? Though, perhaps that isn't possible either. In short, do you think it's possible that the government could come up with an installation that is capable of affecting the thoughts of the populace by using electromagnetic waves. What if they put something into the air (e.g. chemtrails) to amplify the signals? Would this be scientifically possible? Not saying it's happening. Just curious if these types of conspiracy theories are within or against the laws of physics. Not plausibility. Because while I don't believe in these theories, some people I have seen and talked to online do (in the course of my conspiracy theory/ufology research). Simply out of curiosity I wonder if these theories are plausible. Even if perhaps these people have simply gone off the deep end........ perhaps what they are saying is not 100% impossible. Or is it?
Can you explain to me how these passive RF computer-generated imagery doo-dads work? I work with passive RF devices from 9-5 Monday through Friday so I know how they work but I'm just curious how you define passive RF devices and I'm curious how they can generate computer images. Also specifically what wavelength lasers? By definition, lasers are only a very specific band of wavelengths.Your exactly right. Different wavelength lasers are almost assuredly used. They allow remote viewing and target analysis (such as NLP eye movement) as well as facilitate the silent speech interface. They also use passive rf computer generated imagery.
I need one of these bastards so I can battle.. anyone want to loan me the cash? I want black though.
Profit system
Edit: it turned out to be infrasound
Can you explain to me how these passive RF computer-generated imagery doo-dads work? I work with passive RF devices from 9-5 Monday through Friday so I know how they work but I'm just curious how you define passive RF devices and I'm curious how they can generate computer images. Also specifically what wavelength lasers? By definition, lasers are only a very specific band of wavelengths.
Can you explain to me how these passive RF computer-generated imagery doo-dads work? I work with passive RF devices from 9-5 Monday through Friday so I know how they work but I'm just curious how you define passive RF devices and I'm curious how they can generate computer images. Also specifically what wavelength lasers? By definition, lasers are only a very specific band of wavelengths.
Yes, but they're in a controlled infersonic chamber. At your house, in your car, at work, walking around outside, there's absolutely no way a system could modify its operating characteristics because you have ear plugs in. Plugs in. There's no way it can know. There's literally no way to sense that you have ear plugs in.
Exposure to infrasound can markedly impair learning and memory
This study looks at infrasound exposure to rats and the levels they were exposed to were at higher decibels but only for a few hours and only for a few weeks. Humans targeted with infrasonic weapons are continuously bombarded with multiple infrasonic frequencies at 30dB to above 65dB, some continuously focused on certain areas of their brains, Wernics Area is a constant target, for years and even decades. Memory and learning impairment are a very common complain reported by victims.
"Mammalian organs' inherent vibration frequencies are just within the range of those of infrasound; therefore, infrasound can disturb normal functions of multiple organs by triggering biological resonance [6, 7], in which the central nervous system (CNS) is the most vulnerable organ [8–10]. Substantial and growing evidence has revealed that exposure to infrasound can markedly impair the learning and memory ability of rats [9, 11]. The underlying mechanisms include enhanced neuronal apoptosis, production of proinflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress, and microglial activation in the rat hippocampus "
"For learning and memory testing, 24 rats were assigned in equal numbers to four groups (6 rats in each group) (Figure 1(a)): (1) the Sham-SE group. In this group, the rats were maintained under SE conditions and were then placed in the infrasonic chamber for 2 h once daily for 14 days, but without infrasound exposure (IE) (i.e., sham IE); (2) the Sham-EE group. In this group, the rats were maintained under EE conditions and then received sham IE; (3) the IE-SE group. In this group, the rats were maintained under SE conditions, placed in the infrasonic chamber, and treated with 16 Hz and 130 dB IE for 2 h once daily for 14 days; (4) the IE-EE group. In this group, the rats were maintained under EE conditions and then placed in the infrasonic chamber for and treated with 16 Hz and 130 dB IE for 2 h once daily for 14 days. For more detailed information about infrasound device and its parameters,"
Pre-Exposure to Environmental Enrichment Protects against Learning and Memory Deficits Caused by Infrasound Exposure
Shan Jiang, 1 Yong-Qiang Wang, 2 Yi-Fei Tang, 1 Xi Lu, 1 and Dan Guo 1
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9129996/