I'm still kinda hung on meph. Personally I hate it and would never do it again based on the side effects it gave me when I binged ridiculously high amounts. But this is just my personal experience, and it does seem pretty unique. But theres so many more things to consider.
1) are some people just intolerant to meph, and some others lucky?
2) are all the bad side effects are a result of bad synthesis of the chemical with contaminants in it? as there have been many different batches of meph over the yeas.
3) why are there so few documented fatalities (one or two only) from one of the most widely used RC's in the world?
The fatalities do seem low, but this is another thing completely from unknown long term serious health risks.
There's also the possibility that the only reason that mephedrone seems to be getting recent attention as potentially dangerous is because its just so much more popular than all other research chemicals. And if other research chemicals were being used by as many people as meph is, would we be seeing a similar amount of negative side effects? So, in effect, the bad effects are not necissarily due to dangerousness of the drug but due to the inherant side effects that you get from all stimulants and MDxx chems. We're just not seeing a similar amount of side effects for other RC's just because no others are as popular. Does that make sense?
I know that (although these figures are disputed by some, but give a rough estimate) MDMA kills on average 2 in 100,000 users, Alcohol 50 in 100,100 users, Tobacco about 400 in every 100,000 users*. So if meph has 2 deaths in 100,000 users, its not exactly a killer drug in the scale of things.
In the short term, we appear to have been lucky. But I would still advise not to use this one due to my experience with it, and the fact that scientists seem completely happy not studying a drug they know very well is consumed by a lot of people.
We should get some of the pharmacologists on this site with access to free time in a basic lab to meet up with some willing meph users and actually start to measure its effects.
*http://thedea.org/statistics.html#3
The death rate for MDMA, assuming that there really were about 60 deaths directly caused by MDMA in 2000, would be roughly 2 in 100,000 users. The death rate from smoking, by contrast, is on the order of 400 per 100,000 users. Even alcohol, America's official "it's not really a drug" drug, nets about 50 deaths per 100,000 users each year:[3]
[3] Death numbers are based on 'rough justice': The US Centers for Disease Control reports over 100,000 alcohol related deaths per year, with close to 200 million Americans using alcohol. CDC also reports over 400,000 smoking related deaths per year out of about 100 million smokers. The 'ecstasy related' drug deaths number is based on an assumption of about 60 deaths (in all probability there were only a handfull of purely 'ecstasy' deaths) out of a user population of about 3 million (based on the 2000 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse Statistics, conducted by SAMHSA.)